
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Voting experience in Indian e-lections
The 2009 Indian elections can be divided into 2 phases - ‘Deciding’ phase and later the ‘Voting’ phase. Deciding phase is when voters evaluate candidates and decides on a candidate to vote for. The Voting phase involves the process of voting - getting their voter’s ID, information on the right polling station and finally casting their vote.
This year’s elections saw a significant change in the polling experience in both the phases for voters. It was the first digital election in India and had many technological advancements.
The 2008 US elections had a significant influence on the Indian political parties. Inspired by Obama’s campaign, all the major Indian parties quickly utilized the power of social networking tools like facebook, YouTube, Twitter apart from having websites for their parties and candidates. They also utilized Television and mobile phones for campaigning. Television was a big way to get the message to illiterate voters in remote areas. These mediums also supported voters to discuss and voice their opinions, concerns in a transparent environment.
Apart from the political parties, corporates also pitched in to help voters decide. Google, along with Hindustan Times, developed a site which helped users to locate their constituencies and polling booths, the candidates from their constituencies, their background (education, criminal record, etc.) and their quotes. This site helped voters be better informed of the issues by making available comparative area-specific development data such as crime rate, literacy rate, and poverty, among other indicators
Tata’s Jaago-re site helped voters register and get their voter’s ID quickly. This was an improvement from the previous years where voters had to wait for hours in endless queues to first register and then get their photos taken. Users also had the flexibility to register anytime on the website, and were provided the details where they needed to get their voter’s ID.
Voters were categorized by Part number (polling booth) and Serial Number (individual). Voters could find the exact polling room through this information
Finally, the electronic voting machine was very easy to use. The design was simple with the candidate's name, party symbol and an arrow pointing to it and a button next to it in a row. The one touch interface fared better than stamping on the paper, folding it and putting it in the ballot box as previous years. Immediately, the EVM was locked until the polling officer unlocked it for the next voter.
The EVMs assured voters that their votes were counted with better accuracy than manually counting the papers, which was more prone to human errors.
Overall, the digital process was simpler compared to the previous election. One can also say that this was a environment-friendly election with less use of paper. Hopefully, the EVMs can be reused or recycled.
The next election can further simplify the voting process and enhance the voting experience:
- Provide a biometric voter’s ID, which can be scanned and quickly registers the voter at the polling station. This will also prevent misuse as it can read the fingerprint. It can also quickly bring the help information if a voter went to the wrong polling station. This can be similar to the passports and visas issued by few countries.
- Computerize the process of finding the voter’s polling booths at the venue. A lot of people were unable to find their names and did not know where to go as the polling stations did not have computers to quickly find out (esp the place I voted)
- Provide facilities for voters who are traveling or living in a different city or abroad to vote online
- Allow rural voters (with no access to internet) to send questions, concerns to party candidates via SMS
Monday, February 16, 2009
Is it On? or Off?
The LPG cylinder if not handled probably, would create a disaster. However, the knobs do not clearly indicate whether it is on or off. There are few instructions, but are located on the top of the cylinder. If the cylinder is placed below the kitchen counter, one cannot see them from the side.
As you see in the image, the instructions are too small small for something very dangerous.
It is time the LPG cylinders provide clear instructions on how it should be turned off/on. This will avoid the many disasters which happen in India every year.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Lost in Translation?
Bangalore requires that the sign boards be displayed in kannada along with English.
While the sign boards in English are well thought and designed, when they are translated to Kannada or Hindi they forget to carry forward the visual, specifically the type treatment of the original logo. Very few signboards redesign the structure, form, proportion and font metrics of the local script to match the original.


Eg: the below logo in Kannada just italicizes a common font in that language. It also misses the green leaf which is part of the logo. Ultimately, it is unable to visually translate the brand into the local language

This logo forgets to carry the font weight of the original logo

Many times, the translated logo, either in Kannada or Hindi seem to exist only to please the law enforcing authorities. So they are predominantly smaller in size and placed in a corner.
There are few logos which translate their visual identity very well. Below is one of my favorite.

Some may argue since the main logo is in Kananda, a lot of thought might have been put to carry the type characteristics to English.
Another logo which tries to translate(the English neon signboard is also on green background) -


However, most of the companies can also invest in finding or even creating new type in local languages which match the type of the original logo. It ultimately helps carry the brand to the local consumers.
But why does translating the type treatment matter? Simply because logos are a visual depiction of the brand. And the brand carries the company's vision and all that it stands for. Hence, it is imperative to have similar type treatments across various scripts.
p.s. The above comments are only limited to typography and have nothing against the company or brand
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Spell Check Disaster: 'Anshuman' becomes 'Inhuman'...
This incident shows how features in applications which are supposed to make our job easier can actually create havoc (just imagine if Anshuman were his boss...oops!) Also shows the lack of geographic and cultural adaptability of popular applications. Asians, especially Indians form a significant proportion of users of these applications globally. However, only few Indian names are recognized.
Here are few recommendations on how this can be improved-
- Design applications which can provide geographically and culturally appropriate spell check based on the selected country
- Have a database of certain disaster words which double checks when used. Eg: provide message which suggests 'Are you sure you want to change it to 'Inhuman'? This may be irritating, but can definitely save all those embarrassing moments.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Bridging Business Strategy and Design
Friday, October 31, 2008
Tips to Interface Design
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Can card sorting be used to define visual design?
Can this be extended to defining the visual design? We do not have the style specifications yet and different users relate or interpret various visual elements differently. Interpretation of color, form, fonts, layout are based on the individual's past experiences, cultural, socio-economic background and various other such factors.
Card sorting can be used to define visual hierarchy and the style of the application. It can be done with end users or within the design team or involving various teams, clients or all of them.
Keep reading this blog to get to know how to conduct a card sort for visual design
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Personalize or Customize?
Personalized Interface and Customized Interface. Below is the description of differences from the slides of Vinay Mohanty and Devesh Jagatram on slideshare
Customization allows users to explicitly specify what you want. It gives user control at a generic feature level , where users see/hide etc what they want Eg: My Yahoo - user chooses which information elements might be presented on a home page, choosing display colors, etc.
Personalization uses implicit interests and learns what you like from your actions (you are what you click on and what you buy ) E.g. getting the information related to one’s preferences and regular activities Personalization is at the data/ content served level Amazon.com is an example of personalization where the latter learns your interests and adapts to your needs. Personalization also are called 'Adaptive Interfaces'
This brings the question where do I which one?
Customize interfaces to

- Prioritize content
- User controlled content
- Customized Look & Feel for each user
- Promote regular usage
Personalize when you need to
- Promote sales of various products
- Build a relationship that encourages the customer to return
- Provide customized experience for online shopping to make it as real as in-person shopping
- Target each individual customer differently by providing one-to-one marketing
- Predict customer needs and purchase patterns
- Identify customer characteristics by initiating 2 way communication
- Make the interaction efficient and satisfying for both parties
Personalization doesn't waste time as it shows users what everyone else sees and then asking you to search or display / hide things. Make the interaction efficient and satisfying for both parties.
Personalization is increasingly becoming popular as it offers a way to focus on customers / users. Tools like collaborative filtering, rating, click stream analysis, cookies help personalization.
Few examples where it can be used - e-Retailer promotion, Financial portal content recommendation, Help desk or on-line technical support content, Gift recommendations for e-Retailer, Music, movie, book , or other product rating and recommendations, Travel - trip planners
Before defining the interface, decide which one you want to choose. Define what you want the interface to accomplish and select accordingly.
Few materials online -
http://www.slideshare.net/write2vin/user-experience-issues-personalization-vs-customization-presentation
http://www.slideshare.net/stephenpa/the-conversation-gets-interesting-creating-the-adaptive-interface
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
The shopping list interface
- quantity (eg: 2 cans of organic milk)
- size (eg: 200 gms of Tide Powder)
- brand (eg: Pantene shampoo)
- sections/departments in the store (the items located in the front side of the store, like fruits and vegetables, are placed on the top of the list as this is what the shopper immediately sees after entering the store)
- further drilled down to the items in that particular aisle (Under diary section, the first items in the aisle are on the top. eg: If milk is placed as the first item, the shopper will have it on the top under diary section)
What happens when these organized shoppers shop online occasionally? Most of the retail sites allow shopping lists only for returning users. But let's take this particular scenario -
Sue, 43, mother of 3 kids, who usually make the organized list while shopping, accesses the store's website. She does not have much time and quickly needs to buy few items. She know what she needs to buy, but-
- she needs to go to that particular department, scroll through so many items and then enter quantity and add to the cart. she needs to repeat the same process for every item.
- or, she needs to type the item in the search field which displays the results and select and again add to cart
As soon as Sue entered the site, she is given an option to prepare a shopping list. Since she knows exactly what she wants, she can just start typing, exactly the way she writes the list.
The typeahead feature can suggest or help to quickly select the desired products. She can then directly checkout.
This not only saves her time (as her 3 kids keep her busy) due to the reduced number of clicks, but also help continue the offline shopping process in a much efficient manner.